Visit our Blog Visit our Facebook page  Visit our Twitter page  Visit our LinkedIn page
  • Home
    • Our credentials
    • Our team
    • Our experience
    • Our publications
    • Berg Kaprow Lewis
  • Our Services
    • Services to individuals
    • Services to businesses
    • Services to tax professionals
    • Tax investigation services
    • News and Information
  • Useful Tools
    • Business fact sheets
    • Tax calculators
    • Tax tables
    • HMRC and Companies House forms
    • The Budget 2012
    • The Autumn Statement 2011
    • The Budget 2011
    • New business kit
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
    • Enquiry form
BKL Tax Consultants
Creative Tax Thinking
Date:

Related Links

Our credentials
Our team
Our experience
Our publications
Berg Kaprow Lewis
BrassTax news

The benefit of BlackBerries

Some might say, after recent experiences, "What benefit?!" But this note is about the taxation of mobile phones and similar devices.

In principle, if an employer makes an asset available for an employee's private use there is a charge to tax. Ignoring special cases like cars, vans and houses, the annual "benefit in kind" tax charge is at least 20% of the market value of the asset when it's first made available. We say "at least" because if the annual cost to the employer of renting or hiring the thing is more than 20% of its initial market value, the tax charge is on the rent or hire payment. In either case, there is also a tax charge on any additional "running costs" of the asset borne by the employer.

Mobile phones are a special case: an employer can make available one mobile phone (including call charges) to each employee without it giving rise to a tax charge. But there are some important caveats.

First, "mobile phone" means something primarily designed for talking to people. In HMRC's view, this doesn't include "“Personal Digital Assistants" (does anyone outside HMRC use the term anymore?) such as BlackBerries and other smartphones. So the provision of a smartphone will, in principle, give rise to a tax charge.

Second, the mobile phone exemption applies only where the phone is owned (or rented) by the employer. It does not apply where the employee himself contracts with the operator and is reimbursed all or part of the cost by the employer.

All is not quite lost. There is no tax charge on anything which is provided for the sole purpose of carrying out the duties of the employment and which is not in fact used to any significant extent for any private purpose. So the provision of a smartphone, however sophisticated, gives rise to no tax charge if you use it only for business calls. And if your employer reimburses you your mobile phone charges only to the extent of business usage, no tax charge will arise. But if, as is often the case, there is non-business use either of a smartphone provided by an employer or of a phone (whether smart or dim) the charges for which are wholly reimbursed by an employer, a PAYE settlement beckons.

For more on this phone (!) us on 0208 922 9222 or email (from a smartphone or otherwise) on tax@bkltax.co.uk.

Back to top

Berg Kaprow Lewis LLP | Tax Advice London
Head Office:
35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
T: 020 8922 9222 F: 020 8922 9223 E: post@bkl.co.uk
Legal disclaimer | Terms & conditions | VAT No. GB 805 9616 16

IAPA, ACCA, Investors in People, UK200 Group, ICEAW