Visit our Blog Visit our Facebook page  Visit our Twitter page  Visit our LinkedIn page
  • Home
    • Our credentials
    • Our team
    • Our experience
    • Our publications
    • Berg Kaprow Lewis
  • Our Services
    • Services to individuals
    • Services to businesses
    • Services to tax professionals
    • Tax investigation services
    • News and Information
  • Useful Tools
    • Business fact sheets
    • Tax calculators
    • Tax tables
    • HMRC and Companies House forms
    • The Budget 2012
    • The Autumn Statement 2011
    • The Budget 2011
    • New business kit
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
    • Enquiry form
BKL Tax Consultants
Creative Tax Thinking
Date:

Related Links

Our credentials
Our team
Our experience
Our publications
Berg Kaprow Lewis

BrassTax news

On Being Well - Connected

"As any fule kno", relief under the Enterprise Investment Scheme fails if the investor is or becomes "connected" with the company.  One of the principal stumbling blocks is the "30% test" – more specifically where "…the individual  directly or indirectly possesses or is entitled to acquire more than 30% of -

  1. the ordinary share capital of the company or any subsidiary of the company
  2. the loan capital and issued share capital of the company or any such subsidiary, or
  3. the voting power of the company or any such subsidiary…"

The definition in (b) above has come under scrutiny in the recent  Upper Tribunal case of Revenue & Customs Commissioners v Taylor & Haimendorf (FTC/43/2010).  HMRC contended that the loan capital and share capital should be aggregated when calculating the 30%; the claimants argued that the legislation meant 30% of share capital and 30% of loan capital calculated separately and that both limits would have to be breached before the relief was denied.

The First Tier Tribunal had found for the individuals and HMRC appealed to the Upper Tribunal. Roth J considered the matter in some detail and decided two points:-

  1. the relevant measure of "issued share capital" was the nominal or face value, and
  2. HMRC's interpretation was correct, the share capital and loan capital should be combined into a single composite category and the 30% limit applied to that.

So where does this leave us?  Well in a sense back where we started  - the Judge’s decision reinforces the view HMRC have always taken, however it makes a change to at least have some clarity.

To take an example – John pays £10,000 for 100 £1 shares in EISco giving him 10% of the issued share capital. He also lends the company £100,000 and the other investors together put up another £200,000 of loan.

John has only 10% of the share capital but has 33% of the loan capital. When the two are combined his total is over 30% and so he is connected with the company despite having only 10% of the shares.

Just remember that making a loan can make you well-connected.

Back to top

Berg Kaprow Lewis LLP | Tax Advice London
Head Office:
35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
T: 020 8922 9222 F: 020 8922 9223 E: post@bkl.co.uk
Legal disclaimer | Terms & conditions | VAT No. GB 805 9616 16

IAPA, ACCA, Investors in People, UK200 Group, ICEAW