Visit our Blog Visit our Facebook page  Visit our Twitter page  Visit our LinkedIn page
  • Home
    • Our credentials
    • Our team
    • Our experience
    • Our publications
    • Berg Kaprow Lewis
  • Our Services
    • Services to individuals
    • Services to businesses
    • Services to tax professionals
    • Tax investigation services
    • News and Information
  • Useful Tools
    • Business fact sheets
    • Tax calculators
    • Tax tables
    • HMRC and Companies House forms
    • The Budget 2012
    • The Autumn Statement 2011
    • The Budget 2011
    • New business kit
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
    • Enquiry form
BKL Tax Consultants
Creative Tax Thinking
Date:

Related Links

Our credentials
Our team
Our experience
Our publications
Berg Kaprow Lewis

BrassTax news

Brasstax: ESC C16
by David Whiscombe

We suspect that in many cases minds will have been turning to whether now is a good time to bring the life of a company to an end - either because of a desire to capitalise on taper relief while it lasts, or because of the new legislation on income-shifting.  Or perhaps for both reasons.
 
Most readers will be familiar with Extra-statutory concession C16.   This is the concession under which HMRC agree, in effect, to pretend that a liquidator has been appointed to a company so that what are in law dividends subject to Income Tax will instead be subject to CGT.  ESC C16 saves the cost and complexity of a formal liquidation and is sometimes - wholly inaccurately - referred to as the "informal liquidation" route.

ESC C16 will be applied only if certain undertakings are given to HMRC in advance.  These are set out in the concession itself.  However we are finding that before sanctioning ESC C16, HMRC are now routinely seeking two additional undertakings not set out in the concession. These are to the effect that:

  • the company will not transfer or sell its assets or business to another company having some or all of the same shareholders; and
  • the arrangement is not a reconstruction in which some or all of the shareholders in the original company retain an interest in the second company

These additional requirements seem to be directed to ensure that ESC C16 is not applied in the case of "phoenix" companies where a counter-action notice under ITA 2007 s698 might otherwise be considered; nor to reconstructions where no gain would normally be recognised.  But, whatever the reason for these additional undertakings, the point of this note is to suggest to readers that it will now be sensible to include these additional undertakings in the initial application for ESC C16 treatment.

Back to top

Berg Kaprow Lewis LLP | Tax Advice London
Head Office:
35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
T: 020 8922 9222 F: 020 8922 9223 E: post@bkl.co.uk
Legal disclaimer | Terms & conditions | VAT No. GB 805 9616 16

IAPA, ACCA, Investors in People, UK200 Group, ICEAW